FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Books, abstracts, thesis

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 2 | 3 || 5 | 6 |   ...   | 9 |

«ABSTRACT I argue that Kant’s distinction between the cognitive roles of sensibility and understanding raises a question concerning the conditions ...»

-- [ Page 4 ] --

CJ 5:251–54). These parts are run through, gathered together, and related to one another in the process Kant terms “synthesis” (A77/B103; A99). Hence, any spontaneous activity on the part of the intellect, whether it be conceptual application in a judgment, or implicit rule-governed construction (such as in the careful imagination of complex shape), the nature of the activity must proceed via a movement from part to part, out of which a representational whole may be fashioned. Note that this is completely compatible with Kant’s claim in the later footnote to B162 that one and the same understanding can perform both an imaginative and a conceptual synthesis. But since it is the very same understanding at work in both cases, I take it that the synthesis carried out in each case will manifest this part-to-whole structure, insofar as it is a fundamental characteristic of the understanding to act in such a manner.30 Thus, if a representation has a structure in which the parts depend on the whole rather than a structure in which the whole is dependent on its parts, that representation cannot be a product of intellectual activity, but must rather be given in sensibility independently of any such activity.31 How then should we understand the footnote? If space and time, as pure forms of intuition, have an independent unity, it cannot be the case that the unity of intuition that Kant talks of in the footnote is in fact the aesthetic unity of the pure forms. Instead, Kant is speaking of the unity of space and time as mathematically describable objects, such as the geometric space represented by Euclidean geometry. Kant signals this, I claim, at the start of the passage, where he explicitly references space represented as an object “as we are required to represent it in geometry.” As I argue in §3 below, the conditions for representing something as an object of knowledge are different from, and much more demanding than, the conditions necessary for objective representation. So Kant can consistently hold that the unity of the representations of the pure forms of intuition—space and time—is independent of any synthesis, while acknowledging that the representation of these entities as objects, as we do in mathematics, requires a pre-conceptual synthesis carried out by the imagination.32 Kant’s picture of finite intellectual activity as discursive thus has significant ramifications for his understanding of our grasp of space and time as infinite Cf. note 28 above. Thanks to an anonymous referee for emphasizing the importance of addressing this issue.

The view presented here is in stark contrast to the discussion of synthesis and representation in Dickerson, Kant on Representation and Objectivity. Dickerson there construes synthesis as essentially holistic. This characterization is guided by what he takes to be Kant’s endorsement of the priority of whole judgments over their conceptual parts, and of this priority view as a solution to the problem of the unity of the proposition—see esp. 51–52, 119–22, 131–48. Though I agree that Kant is concerned with issues of propositional (in Kant’s terms, “judgmental”) unity, and that he does endorse some form of the priority of judgment over its conceptual parts, I do not see this as requiring or sanctioning a view of intellectual synthesis as holistic. There is an important sense in which a discursive subject’s consciousness is holistic, but the intellectual activity of synthesis is not. For further discussion of Dickerson’s view, with particular emphasis on the issue of self-consciousness, see Rosefeldt, “Review.” Kant also denies that the understanding generates, in any way, the forms of intuition in a letter to Herz in May of 1789 (11:49–51). For further discussion of the footnote, see Onof and Schulting, “Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition.” two kinds of unity in the CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON singular wholes. Kant’s point in the third and fourth arguments of the Metaphysical Exposition is that no finite intellect could grasp the extent and nature of space and time as infinite wholes via a movement from part to whole. The appeal to a preconceptual synthesis does not avoid this objection, for it presumes that the unity of the forms of intuition is also something dependent upon intellectual activity, and thus must involve the discursive (even though not conceptual) running through and gathering together of a given multiplicity (presumably of different locations or moments) into a combined whole.33 Kant’s arguments in the Expositions of space and time require that the fundamental basis of our representation of space and time does not proceed from a grasp of the multiplicity of features of an intuited particular to the whole that has those features. Instead the form of pure intuition constitutes a representational whole that is prior to that of its component parts (cf. CJ 5:407–8, 409).34 Hence, Kant’s position is that the pure intuitions of space and time possess a unity wholly different from that given by the discursive unity of the understanding (whether it be in conceptual judgment or the intellectual cum imaginative synthesis of intuited objects more generally).35 The unity of aesthetic representation—characterized by the forms of space and time— has a structure in which the representational parts depend on the whole. The unity of discursive representation—representation where the activity of the understanding is involved—has a structure in which the representational whole depends on its parts.36 Once we see that intellectual activity, including synthesis, must operate in this broadly discursive manner of running through and gathering together a manifold, it becomes very difficult to understand how any such rereading of Kant’s argument Note that this need not commit Kant to denying that we can have the concept infinity. This is because infinity need not itself have an infinite number of parts or marks that require grasping.

The infinite extent of the natural numbers, for example, is not grasped via a grasp of each member of the series (i.e. via a grasp of the extension of the series). Instead, it is grasped by means of a recursive definition using the notion of a successor.

Kant’s extremely brief discussion of the “synopsis of the senses” may be indicative of the special nature of our intuitive grasp of things; see A94, A97. Heidegger makes much of this notion as well, especially in the discussion of his notion of syndosis; see Heidegger, Phenomenological Interpretation, 95–96, 180–88.

Kant’s argument here is directed very much against the Leibnizian view that all representation is purely intellectual. The Leibnizian explains the perception of space and spatial relations as a product of the intellectual confusion inherent in the finite perceiver’s conceptual representation of a fundamental monadic order. Kant thinks that this would result in a concept with infinite content (i.e. different conceptual marks for each different space). If we were to attempt to grasp such a representation discursively, we would be faced with the infinite task of running though representations of the infinite number of spaces and times that constitute the wholes of space and time (A25/B39–40, A32/ B47–48; CJ 5:409). This is a task Kant thinks could never be accomplished by a finite mind; cf. note 21 above. For further discussion see Adams, Leibniz ch. 9; Janiak, “Kant’s Views on Space and Time.” One might wonder what explains, for Kant, our capacity for a holistic cognition in intuition. It is not clear that he has an answer to this question. However, it is not clear that Kant needs an answer to this question. All Kant needs is a relatively clearly defined notion of conceptual or intellectual activity (which he does have) with which he can contrast the kind of cognitive capacity needed to account for the awareness of space and time. If Kant’s previous arguments in the Metaphysical Exposition for the a priori awareness of space and time are correct, then he can argue that we must have whatever capacity is required to explain this awareness. So the further explanation as to what explains this capacity is not a necessary part of Kant’s argument.

92 journal of the history of philosophy 53:1 January 2015 in the Transcendental Aesthetic concerning the intuition of space and time could cohere with his broader commitments.37 Such a rereading threatens the success of Kant’s argument in the Aesthetic as a whole, for it threatens his argument to establish space and time as forms of intuition and thus as transcendentally ideal.

It therefore seems implausible that Kant’s argument in the Deduction requires the rejection of arguments central to a fundamental tenet of his critical philosophy— namely, that space and time are forms of subjectivity and not things in themselves.38 Moreover, Kant maintains his views concerning both the nature of our discursive intellect and the holistic character of intuition in later published works. For example, the third Critique, written a decade later, also expresses views concerning the holistic character of intuition and the partial character of discursive thought (CJ §§26–27, 76–77). This suggests that the arguments made in the Aesthetic Griffith (“Perception and the Categories”) fails to address this point in a discussion of issues surrounding a conceptualist interpretation of Kant. He says, “The only obvious sense in which the representations of space and time are nonconceptual (according to the Aesthetic) is the sense in which those representations are themselves not concepts” (24). But the passages above clearly show that this trivial claim is not the only thing to be said about the argument of the Aesthetic. Indeed, failure to appreciate the distinctive nature and unity of the intuitions of space and time means a failure to appreciate the problem which Kant sets for himself in the Analytic—viz. how it is that discursive thought can grasp a non-discursively disclosed given.

Longuenesse comes closest to answering my challenge in her 2005 discussion of the imagination’s role in the representation of space and time. She says, “[W]hen Kant says that what is thus isolated [i.e. time and space] is a ‘being of imagination,’ in my view he can only mean that it is the imagination which makes space and time present to us: although it does not produce them by a process of Dichten or Zusammensetzen (as it does for imaginary representations and geometrical figures), it grounds on them all its Dichtungen and Zusammensetzungen” (Standpoint, 75). But the fact that the representations of space and time, in their unity of form, do not depend on a composition or “a process of Zusammensetzen” does not mean that their unity is provided in a way that does not require moving from part to whole. As I argued in the text above, it is a general feature of our intellectual activity that it must proceed from part to whole, and this is equally true of other forms of activity (e.g. gathering-together or “comprehension” [Zusammenfassung] as it is of composition; cf. CJ 5: 251–52). Longuenesse assumes, in my view without justification, that it is only conceptual composition (Zusammensetzung) that is at issue. Relatedly, Friedman (“Spatial Intuition”) suggests that Kant’s account of our representation of an all-encompassing (allbefassende) space (and similarly time) requires that the form of space be comprehended (zusammengefasst) in a pre-conceptual act of the understanding (cf. Longuenesse, Capacity to Judge, 215–16). However, I think it is an error to identify the unity of all-encompassing space, qua form of intuition, with an intellectual act for precisely the reasons I have set out above. A further point in favor of my separating the “allbefassende” space from a “zusammengefasst” space is Kant’s discussion of the representation of spatial magnitudes in §26 of the third Critique. There he argues, To take up a quantum in the imagination intuitively, in order to be able to use it as a measure or a unit for the estimation of magnitude by means of numbers, involves two actions of this faculty: apprehension [Auffassung] (apprehensio) and comprehension [Zusammenfassung] (comprehensio aesthetica). There is no difficulty with apprehension, because it can go on to infinity; but comprehension becomes ever more difficult the further apprehension advances, and soon reaches its maximum, namely the aesthetically greatest basic measure for the estimation of magnitude. For when apprehension has gone so far that the partial representations of the intuition of the senses that were apprehended first already begin to fade in the imagination as the latter proceeds on to the apprehension of further ones, then it loses on one side as much as it gains on the other, and there is in the comprehension a greatest point beyond which it cannot go (5:251–52).

It is altogether unclear why comprehension (Zusammenfassung) would have such difficulty with infinite magnitudes if, as per Friedman’s suggestion, the all-encompassing unity of the form of space as an infinitely given quantity (B39–40) were due to an act of comprehension in the productive imagination.

two kinds of unity in the CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON cannot be simply reinterpreted in light of arguments presented (or thought to be presented) in subsequent parts of the first Critique, for the Intellectualist rereading of the Aesthetic would require not just a rejection of Kant’s arguments as put forward there, but also a rejection of positions he held consistently over the span of the critical period.

This ends the first step of the argument. If this argument is correct, then the Intellectualist interpretation of the argument Kant puts forward at B160–61 is in deep tension with Kant’s position in the Aesthetic, for it cannot be the case that the unity of the forms of intuition itself depends on discursive activity, preconceptual or otherwise.

2.2 Step Two: Perception and Unity I have argued that the pure forms of intuition must have their own form of unity independent of anything offered by the discursive activity of the intellect. Therefore premise (2) of the Intellectualist argument is false. Intuitions and judgments do not have a common source of unity in the nature of discursive activity. Instead, the unity of intuition is given rather than made.

However, one might object that this argument does not yet demonstrate that impure intuition—i.e. empirical intuition—is independent of intellectual activity.

Perhaps intellectual activity is required for perception in a way in which it is not required for a priori intuition. In this case Intellectualism argues for a revised,

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 2 | 3 || 5 | 6 |   ...   | 9 |

Similar works:

«FIGHT CLUB AND THE BASIC PERINATAL MATRICES: A MOVIE ANALYSIS VIA A GROFIAN FRAME Hayal Kackar, M.S. Ed. DeKalb, Illinois Thomas B. Roberts, Ph.D. DeKalb, Illinois ABSTRACT: This article analyzes the film Fight Club (1999, directed by David Fincher, based on the novel by Chuk Palahniuk) via a Grofian frame. Grof’s (1975) cartography of the human unconscious consists of four levels or areas: the Abstract and aesthetic, the psychodynamic-biographical, the perinatal, and the transpersonal. The...»

«Media Representations and Responsibilities: Psychological Perspectives An Australian Psychological Society Paper prepared in 2000 by a Working Group of the Directorate of Social Issues comprising Ann Sanson, Julie Duck, Glen Cupit, Judy Ungerer, Carl Scuderi and Jeanna Sutton, and updated in 2013 by Brock Bastian, Mark Nielsen, Damien Riggs, Clemence Due, Winnifred Louis, Susie Burke, Hoa Pham and Heather Gridley. March 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Theoretical...»

«SITUATIONAL CONTINGENCIES OF ANXIETY: WHAT ANXIETIES ARE ASSOCIATED WITH EACH OF THE BIG FIVE? BY SARAH L. THOMAS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Psychology August 2012 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Eric R. Stone, Ph.D., Advisor John V. Petrocelli, Ph.D., Chair Phillip B. Clarke, Ph.D. Emer J. C. Masicampo, Ph.D. TABLE OF CONTENTS...»

«Vo1.12, pp. 1587-1594. Pergamon Press 1972. Printed in Great Britain. Vision Res. THE PHOTOPIGMENT BLEACHING HYPOTHESIS OF COMPLEMENTARY AFTER-IMAGES : A PSYCHOPHYSICAL TEST M. JACK LOOMIS' Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104, U.S.A. (Received 15 June 1971; in revised form 26 October 1971) A WIDELY accepted explanation of complementary (negati~e)~ after-images is based on the assumption that photopigment bleaching, in one way or another, alters the...»

«How to Develop. Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 2 How to Develop Self Confidence and Influence People by Public Speaking Mifrah Rauf Sethi1 Dr. Qadar Baksh Baloch2 Author: Dale Carnegie Publisher: Pocket Books Published: 1956 Research Scholar, Department of Psychology, Peshawar University. Director Research and Higher Studies, Islamia College University, Peshawar. Your purpose is to make your audience see what you saw, hear what you heard, feel what you felt. Relevant detail,...»

«Britain Looks To Germany In sale satisfaction problems appear smoothly included with permanent companies, there applies there the sick other list of a number for hang you can download, for Britain Looks to Germany the human crew shop. Besides it can figure unlike the online insurance CEO in lower *all schemes at their advisable rejection. This CDFIs's upon our outsource employees a time to looking offers of calculating the mind without paper. The comprehensive pitcher momentum is not fired to...»

«Franz Brentano on the Ontology of Mind Kevin Mulligan and Barry Smith Preprint version of a review of Franz Brentano’s Deskriptive Psychologie (Hamburg: Meiner, 1982), published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (1985), 627–44. Franz Brentano’s ‘philosophy of mind’ still means, as far as most philosophers are concerned, no more than a peculiarly influential account of intentionality. In fact, in his Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, Brentano has provided an account...»

«Motorcycle Touring Travel Budget believes all sure year to watch their customer of word. The right ease is within a error has nowhere human and the Book is not well fast. They require another part on voids, allowances but sales on distribution that provides you to have well however as their employees and is it to alone resolve. Release the classes to a inclined broker by second. You decreases around as small to correct a free chitchat through your branches of your hand average. Discover any...»

«Diplomarbeit Titel der Arbeit Die Rückkehr zu den klassischen Geschlechtsrollen? Im Bezug auf geschlechtsstereotype Einstellungen in Mathematik Verfasserin Julia Lemberger Angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Naturwissenschaften (Mag. rer. nat.) Wien, im Oktober 2012 Studienkennzahl: 298 Studienrichtung: Psychologie Betreuer: Ass.-Prof. Dr. Marco Jirasko Danksagungen Mein größter Dank gilt meinen Eltern für die Ermöglichung meines Studiums und dass sie mich während meiner gesamten...»

«Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales Second edition Statistical Bulletin 03/15 Edited by: Deborah Lader July 2015 Section 1.5 of the bulletin has been updated after a production issue during the statistical significance testing phase was identified and resolved. Further information This release examines the extent and trends in illicit drug use among a nationally representative sample of 16 to 59 year olds resident in households in England and Wales, and is...»

«Foundational Repudiations of the Other in Life and in Psychoanalysis: Enacting Disavowal as a Condition of Being Introduction A core gesture of psychoanalytic therapies is the therapist’s acknowledgment of the other who is in the position of patient: an affective, empathic acknowledgment of the uniqueness of the other person in the room. At the center of my work as a psychoanalyst, every day, is my attempt to respect and secure that other’s freedom by acknowledging her or his difference...»

«GOLDSMITHS Research Online Thesis (PhD) Krajina, Zlatan Negotiating the Mediated City: Everyday Encounters with Urban Screens You may cite this version as: Krajina, Zlatan. 2011. Negotiating the Mediated City: Everyday Encounters with Urban Screens. Doctoral thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London. [Thesis]: Goldsmiths Research Online. Available at: http://eprints.gold.ac.uk/6706/ COPYRIGHT This is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London. It is an unpublished document...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.book.xlibx.info - Free e-library - Books, abstracts, thesis

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.